The Neighborhood Intervention Program (N.I.P.) began in July 1987 at the request of the County Executive’s Office in response to continuing concerns related to minority youth in Dane County. N.I.P was developed with modest financial support as part of the Dane County Juvenile Court program that would focus efforts of community resources in order to address the lack of adequate prevention and early intervention resources for youth in the community. In 1990, at the request of the County executive, the Neighborhood Intervention Program was transferred to the Dane County Department of Human Services: Children, Youth and Families (CYF) Division in order to become more integrated in the general service delivery and supervision services provided to youth and families. Since that time, the Neighborhood Intervention Program has become an essential component of our human services system, working cooperatively with local law enforcement, schools, and community agencies to address concerns and issues facing youth.
The Neighborhood Intervention Program is dedicated to redirecting at-risk youth by holding them accountable, building youth competencies and protecting the community. We use a collaborative approach and investment of time and attention to establish influential relationships with at-risk youth that promote a positive outlook on family, community, education and life.
Neighborhood Intervention Program’s vision is to promote a positive impact on family, community, education and life by redirecting the behaviors of youth.
Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC):
Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) has been an issue that our society has been struggling with for many decades both nationally as well as locally. Unfortunately Dane County is one such community that faces these challenges. DMC initiatives examine the disparate involvement with, or contact of, minority groups with certain systems and potential remedies. In Dane County we strive to examine these concerns and provide concrete solutions that attempt to address them.
N.I.P. has been housed at several locations in Madison and is now located on N. Sherman Avenue. In 2017, the North East ongoing supervision Team (NET) moved to the N.I.P. building. In 2020, the South West ongoing supervision Team (SWT) moved to the N.I.P. building. As a result, all Dane County Youth Justice units are now consolidated in one building.
The Balanced and Restorative Justice (BARJ) Model suggests that in response to crime we need to focus on three goals:
COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (of kids and families)Building in youth and families, the ability to do the kinds of things that are valued by the community and providing the opportunity to do these activities.
ACCOUNTABILITYPromoting restoration of the human and relational aspects disrupted by crime by having an offender understand and accept responsibility for the harm to others and taking the necessary steps to repair the losses incurred through that harm.
COMMUNITY PROTECTIONResponding in ways that promote both short and long-term safety for the community.
In focusing on these three goals, Social Workers assess youth referred for law violations and make recommendations about to the court system partners about how to best address the youth’s needs. A variety of programming, via both in-house and purchase of service providers is available to address individual needs. While developed initially as in intervention strategy, many of the BARJ are consistent with the best research and practices in preventing delinquent behavior.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the objective, balanced, and responsible use of current research and the best available data to guide policy and practice decisions, such that outcomes for consumers are improved. Used originally in the health care and social science fields, evidence-based practice focuses on approaches demonstrated to be effective through empirical research rather than through anecdote or professional experience alone.
An evidence-based approach involves an ongoing, critical review of research literature to determine what information is credible, and what policies and practices would be most effective given the best available evidence. It also involves rigorous quality assurance and evaluation to ensure that evidence-based practices are replicated with fidelity, and that new practices are evaluated to determine their effectiveness.
In contrast to the terms "best practices" and "what works," evidence-based practice implies that 1) there is a definable outcome(s); 2) it is measurable; and 3) it is defined according to practical realities (recidivism, victim satisfaction, etc.). Thus, while these three terms are often used interchangeably, EBP is more appropriate for outcome-focused human service disciplines.
(Source: Crime and Justice Institute at Community Resources for Justice (2009). Implementing Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Community Corrections, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.)
EBP suggests it is important to pay attention to dosage: as risk increases, so should treatment hours, length of treatment, and intensity of contacts.
Equally important, low-risk youth could be negatively affected by traditional contact standards and contacts with more high-risk level youth. For high-risk youth with multiple high-risk factors, it is best to address the highest risk factors first. Mark Carey recommends a focus on the risk factors that are behind the youth’s illegal behavior, a response that teaches skills to youth that directly link to their motivation to participate in risky behaviors and repetitive skills practice.
Wisconsin has selected an assessment tool for use statewide that considers a youth’s risk to reoffend in the context of the youth’s needs and strengths. The Youth Assessment Screening Instrument (YASI) is validated for youth and measures risk, needs, and strengths and helps develop case plans for at-risk youth. The YASI also has a pre-screen version that is used to help guide early decision making and assign case resources. The YASI looks to identify both the dynamic (changeable) and static (historic and unchangeable) risk factors of youth in order to guide case planning and better structure and target services to those youth with higher needs. The YASI assesses both protective factors (strengths) and risk. The protective factors are used to mitigate risk.
Assessment information is gathered from multiple sources, including but not limited to the youth, the family, law enforcement reports, schools, official records, referral information, etc. The YASI is a tool used in conjunction with one’s interviewing skills to gather information from the youth through a series of questions. It is structured to help initiate discussions with the youth about relevant domains to help assess static and dynamic risk factors.
The YASI will help guide the creation of a relevant case plan that promotes positive behavioral change. The YASI assessment and case planning process is individualized and matches supervision and intervention strategies with the youth’s motivation level.